Phone, chat, and email coverage
The core three handled by the same team, so answers do not vary by channel.
Outsourced service
Customers do not think in channels. Omnichannel coverage puts one trained team behind phone, chat, email, social, and messaging, working to the same documented standard.
Discuss omnichannel contact center
What we handle
Choose the tasks you need now and expand the scope when the workload changes.
The core three handled by the same team, so answers do not vary by channel.
Comments, direct messages, and public reviews answered in your brand voice.
WhatsApp and similar channels covered where your customers actually are.
A customer who starts on chat and calls back does not repeat themselves.
Rules for what belongs on which channel and what escalates to a call.
One view of volume, response time, and resolution rather than separate silos.
Designed around you
We adapt to your tools, communication rhythm, approvals, brand standards, and escalation process.
Where this runs
Free consultation
Tell us what your team is spending time on and we will scope the omnichannel contact center coverage, team size, and reporting that fits.
FAQ
Common questions about outsourcing omnichannel contact center.
One trained team covers phone, chat, email, social comments and direct messages, public reviews, and messaging apps such as WhatsApp where your customers use them. Agents answer from the same knowledge and the same policies on every channel, so a customer gets the same answer by email as by phone. What stays with you is policy itself: refund limits, exceptions, public statements during an incident, and anything legal or press related. You also keep ownership of the accounts and pages agents work in. We operate inside them with the permissions you grant, and you can remove that access at any time.
Context only carries across channels if every contact lands in one customer record. In practice that means agents work in your help desk or CRM, such as Zendesk, Freshdesk, or Salesforce, with phone, chat, email, and social connected to it. They are trained to read the history before replying and to write notes the next agent can use. If your channels currently live in separate tools with no shared record, we will tell you that during scoping. Agents can work around it with disciplined note taking, but the real fix is on the systems side and is your decision.
Written channels create records, so the rules matter more than on the phone. Agents are trained not to ask for card numbers, passwords, or identity documents in chat, social messages, or email, and to move a conversation to a safer channel when verification is needed. Public replies on social never include account details. Access to each tool is granted by role, with confidentiality terms agreed before launch. If card payments are involved, PCI DSS governs how cardholder data is handled, and the payment step should sit outside the chat transcript. Tell us during scoping which channels ever touch sensitive information.
After a discovery call, a project manager maps each channel: what arrives there, how fast customers expect a reply, which issues belong on which channel, and when a chat or message should become a phone call. You supply your policies, saved replies, tone of voice guidance, and examples of good and bad responses. Agents are trained on the whole set, not one channel each, because the point is one standard. A common approach is to launch the busiest channels first and add the others once quality is steady. The order and timing are agreed during scoping and depend on your volume and tools.
Yes, and this is one of the practical advantages of a single cross-trained team. When chat surges during a promotion or social fills up during an outage, agents can be moved toward the busy channel instead of sitting idle on a quiet one. For planned peaks, give us the dates and expected volume so staffing and any extra training happen beforehand. For incidents, agree a holding message and an approval path in advance, because agents should not improvise public statements. Evening, weekend, and holiday coverage can be set per channel, since not every channel needs the same hours.
Each channel has its own natural measures, such as wait time on the phone, first response time on email, and the number of chats an agent handles at once. Quality, though, is scored against one scorecard so the standard does not drift by channel. Reviews sample calls, chats, emails, and social replies and check accuracy, tone, policy adherence, and the quality of the notes left behind. Reporting brings volume, response time, and resolution into one view instead of a report per tool. Targets are defined during scoping and the reporting rhythm is agreed up front. Escalations follow the same path whichever channel they started on.
Ask whether the same agents work every channel or whether each channel has its own team, because separate teams are multichannel, not omnichannel. Ask to see how a customer history looks to an agent in a tool like yours. Ask how written quality is checked, since a good phone agent is not always a good writer. Ask who approves public replies during an incident and how channel hours are staffed. Ask for a sample report covering all channels in one view. Finally, ask what they would do if your systems cannot share context. The answer shows whether they understand the problem.
If nearly all your customers reach you one way, usually by phone or email, a single-channel program is simpler to run and easier to staff. Adding channels nobody asked for creates inboxes that must be watched and quality that must be checked. It is also premature if your tools cannot share a customer record, because agents will be answering across channels without the context that makes the model work. In that case, fix the systems first or start with two connected channels. We would sooner run a smaller scope well than take on channels that will sit mostly empty.
Related services